Charlie Brummer (Chair), Stephanie Greene, JoAnn Lamb, and Ian Ray
1.The germplasm releases registered in Crop Science since the 1994 meeting are presented in Table 1. This information will be input into GRIN, as well as information on registered cultivars.
2.Cultivars not registered in Crop Science are neither placed into the germplasm system nor noted in GRIN. Preserving all cultivars may not be necessary, but some non-registered cultivars may be valuable and should be entered into the system after their commercially productive life. Anyone who thinks that some cultivars are particularly worthy of saving should contact the committee. Additionally, we need to develop criteria for "benchmark varieties" so that future cultivars can be preserved more effectively.
3.The committee encourages breeders to release breeding lines and to register them with Crop Science. All lines do not necessarily need to go into GRIN, so prioritized lists of breeding lines would be optimal. Phenotypic marker stocks are particularly useful for breeding and genetic studies but few are currently available. Lines do not need a Crop Science registration to be deposited in GRIN. Stephanie Greene would like to visit long running, public alfalfa breeding programs with large germplasm repositories?primarily Minnesota, California, and Cornell?to go through the collections and add relevant material to GRIN.
Table 1.Germplasm releases subsequent to the 1994 report of the Committee on Available Breeding Lines. | ||||||
Germplasm | PI No. | Trait(s) selected | Source Germplasm | Selection Method | Selection Location | Remarks and Reference |
UCRD-A(H)2 | 591437 | Small (L) and large (H) receptacle diameter (RD) | 'CUF 101'(A)
'Team' (B) 'Vernal' (C) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection | Greenhouse, Davis, CA | Seed yield of (L) germplasm averaged more seed
than (H) populations due to production of more small seeds. No data on
forage yield or disease and insect resistances are available.
Teuber and Green. 1996. CS 36:1420. |
UCRD-A(L)2 | 591436 | |||||
UCRD-B(H)2 | 591439 | |||||
UCRD-B(L)2 | 591438 | |||||
UCRD-C(H)2 | 591440 | |||||
UCRD-C(L)2 | 591442 | |||||
UCDS-A(H)2 | 593250 | Low (L) and high (H) seed yield (S) | 'CUF 101' (A)
'Team' (B) 'Vernal' (C) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection | University of California, Davis Field Research Facility (UCD) or the West Side Field Station in Five Points, CA (UCWS) | Considerable G x E occurred between several
of the high-low germplasms, due to inability to improve seed yield in Prosser,
WA when selection was done in Five Points, CA. No data on forage yield
or disease and insect resistances are available.
Teuber and Green. 1996. CS 36:142. |
UCDS-A(L)2 | 593249 | |||||
UCDS-B(H)2 | 591450 | |||||
UCDS-B(L)2 | 593253 | |||||
UCDS-C(H)2 | 591451 | |||||
UCDS-C(L)2 | 593254 | |||||
UCWSS-A(H)2 | 593251 | |||||
UCWSS-A(L)2 | 593252 | |||||
UCWSS-B(H)2 | 591448 | |||||
UCWSS-B(L)2 | 591447 | |||||
UCWSS-C(H)2 | 591449 | |||||
UCWSS-C(L)2 | 593255 | |||||
UCDS/P-A(H)2 | 591445 | Low (L) and high (H) seeds per pod (S/P) | 'CUF 101' (A)
'Team' (B) 'Vernal' (C) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection | University of California, Davis Field Research Facility (UCD) or the West Side Field Station in Five Points, CA (UCWS) | High selections produced more seeds per pod
than low selections at both Five Points, CA and Prosser, WA, except UCWSS/P-C(L)2
and -C(H)2 which did not differ at Prosser. No data on forage yield or
disease and insect resistances are available.
Teuber and Green. 1996. CS 36:1422. |
UCDS/P-A(L)2 | 593245 | |||||
UCDS/P-B(H)2 | 591446 | |||||
UCDS/P-B(L)2 | 593246 | |||||
UCDS/P-C(H)2 | 593248 | |||||
UCDS/P-C(L)2 | 593247 | |||||
UCWSS/P-A(H)2 | 591442 | |||||
UCWSS/P-A(L)2 | 591441 | |||||
UCWSS/P-B(H)2 | 591443 | |||||
UCWSS/P-B(L)2 | 593243 | |||||
UCWSS/P-C(H)2 | 591444 | |||||
UCWSS/P-C(L)2 | 593244 | |||||
MSR | 590999 | Resistance to Sclerotina trifoliorum Eriks. | 'Delta' | Phenotypic recurrent selection | Laboratory,
USDA ARS and Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. |
MSR had greater survival of plants in field experiments
and in lab screenings then all entries in the Southern Regional Alfalfa
Variety Tests, 1992-1995. Yields of MSR were superior to several elite
cultivars under severe disease conditions.
Pratt and Rowe. 1996. CS 36:821-822 |
UCNP-A32 | 591458 | High forage yield and nitrogen concentration | 'African' (A)
'Hairy Peruvian' (HP) 'Moapa 69' (M69) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection with independent culling (A, HP) and differing pop. sizes (M69) | Greenhouse, Davis, CA | Increases in forage N and forage quality were generally observed in these populations. Forage yields were greater for some populations (-A3, -HP3) and less for other populations (-M69-3; -M69-2)relative to the source germplasm. Teuber et al. 1996. CS 36:473. |
UCNP-HP32 | 591459 | |||||
UCNP-M69-32 | 591460 | |||||
UCNP M69(N2+NO3)2 | 591461 | |||||
UCNP-M69-33 | 591462 | |||||
UCNF-M69(I-0)2 | 591463 | High forage yield and nitrogen concentration | 'Moapa 69' (M69) | Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection with independent culling | Agronomy and Range Science Field Research Facility, Davis, CA | Selected under 0, 33, 66, or 100 kg N ha-1.
Increases in dry weight and N concentration were found under greenhouse
conditions.
Teuber et al. 1996. CS 36:474. |
UCNF-M69(I-33)2 | 591464 | |||||
UCNF-M69(I-66)2 | 591465 | |||||
UCNF-M69(I-100)2 | 591466 | |||||
UCSAR-ET(L)2 | 591467 | Ease of floret tripping | 'Saranac' (SAR)
'CUF101' (CUF) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection | Greenhouse, Davis, CA | Plants selected for easy-to-trip (L) required
less force and for hard-to-trip (H) more force fro tripping under both
field and greenhouse conditions. Seed and forage yields and pest resistances
have not been determined.
Knapp et al. 1996. CS 36:475. |
UCSAR-ET(H)2 | 591468 | |||||
UCCUF-ET(L)2 | 591469 | |||||
UCCUF-ET(L)2 | 591470 | |||||
UCNE-A(H)2 | 591454 | Nectar volume | 'CUF 101' (A)
'Team' (B) 'Vernal' (C) |
Two cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection | Greenhouse, Davis, CA | Nectar volumes of low and high populations were
significantly from the respective cultivars in both field and greenhouse
evaluations.
Teuber and Green. 1996. CS 36:475-476. |
UCNE-A(L)2 | 591453 | |||||
UCNE-B(H)2 | 591452 | |||||
UCNE-B(L)2 | 591455 | |||||
UCNE-C(H)2 | 591457 | |||||
UCNE-C(L)2 | 591456 | |||||